15] Now if the entire deposition of the Respondent is perused, there is no reference to the transfer of two other service engineers to Bhopal and the Petitioner not insisting upon their compliance with the transfer order, but insisting upon the Respondent complying with his transfer order. In fact, the Respondent in his deposition has admitted that there was transfer clause in his appointment letter and that he was aware about the rules of the company regarding admissibility of allowances of transfer from one place to another. The deposition, if considered in its totality emphasizes upon non payment of increments for over six years, which according to the Respondent resulted in a ' loss of Rs.6,48,000/- ' towards the increment amount. The interest for 72 months at the rate of 18% per annum, house rent allowances at Bhopal, privilege leave and expenses for transfer to Bhopal etc., the amount came to be a total of Rs.14,15,340/-. The deposition basically emphasizes upon non-payment of such dues and consequent ' unfair labour practices '. There is no clear and cogent evidence to establish that transfer was mala fide or under the guise of following management policy. In the circumstances, there is substance in
