Petitioner's writ petition held infructuous as State Government passed a subsequent order; petition disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 719.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 719 OF 2013
Shantilal Jain Agro Produce Market Pvt. Ltd. .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents
Shri Sachin Rishud, Advocate h/f Shri M. M. Bhokarikar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. B. Pulkundwar, A.G.P. for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 21ST MARCH, 2013.
PER COURT :
. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that, subsequently the State Government has passed an order. As such, the petition has become infructuous.
[ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/March 13
Shantilal Jain Agro Produce Market Pvt. Ltd.
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
