Disposed
Anil Trimbak Gade and Ors. v. the State of Mah and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/705/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.705 OF 2013
1] Anil Trimbak Gade2] Dada Gokul Kote3] Sachin Naju Kale 4] Ganesh Bakru Ahire.. Petitioners.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others.
.. Respondent.
Mr.V.P. Savant, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. K.G. Patil, APP for respondent
State/Authorities.
Mr. A.R. Nikam, Advocate for respondent NO.3.
CORAM :- A.H. JOSHI &
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE :- 30TH JANUARY, 2013.
ORDER:-
1]Petitioners want to be governed by the
order passed by this Court while deciding W.P.
2
No. 7757 of 2012 with group of other petitions.
2]Learned AGP appears for respondent Nos. 1
and 2 while Shri Nawale, Advocate appaers for
respondent No. 3 and they have no objection.
3]Therefore, Rule is made absolute in terms
of order passed in Writ Petition No. 7757 of 2012,
and group accompanying it.
[SUNIL P. DESHMUKH,J][A.H. JOSHI,J]
grt/-.
Anil Trimbak Gade
Dada Gokul Kote
Sachin Naju Kale
Ganesh Bakru Ahire
The State of Maharashtra
A.H. Joshi
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court