The High Court declined to interfere with an interim maintenance order of Rs.10,000. A minor clerical error regarding the wife's residence in the impugned order was directed to be corrected by the trial judge.
The interim maintenance order was not interfered with; the trial judge was directed to correct an error regarding the parties' residence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP No.6971_2012
jsn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.6971 OF 2012
Mrs. Sonali Agarwal & Ors.
-- Petitioners
V/s.
-- Mr. Sanjay Agarwal Respondent
Ms. Vandana, Adv. for the Petitioner.
CORAM : MRS. ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATE : 4th January, 2013.
P.C. :-
2
WP No.6971_2012
The title of the petition also shows that address. Paragraph 3 of the impugned order further shows that the applicants who are wife and children of the Respondent husband reside in the “maternal home of the applicant No.1 since last one year”. Her maternal home is not in Khargar but in Nerul, Navi Mumbai. Her matrimonial home is in Khargar, where she has alleged that she was harassed.
( ROSHAN DALVI, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim maintenance order granted should be interfered with.
Sonali Agarwal & Ors.
Sanjay Agarwal
Roshan Dalvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
