This court dismissed a writ petition seeking implementation of a School Tribunal order, noting the petitioner has an available statutory remedy. The petition was disposed of without entertaining the substantive prayer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp6691
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.6691 OF 2013
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.Manish Dixit i/b Kulkarni & Associates for the
Petitioner
Mr.A.D.Kango, AGP for the Respondent Nos.2 and 4
Mr.V.S.Ghosalkar i/b Mr.Aumkar V. Joshi for respondent
No.3
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
REVATI MOHITE DERE,JJ.
DATE : OCTOBER 18,2013.
P.C.
1The substantive prayer in the
petition is for implementation of the
order passed by the learned Presiding
Officer of the School Tribunal. The
petitioner has a statutory remedy for
redressal of his grievances. In view
of availability of the remedy, petition
is not entertained and the same is
disposed of by keeping the remedy open.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE,J)(A.S.OKA,J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether writ petition should be entertained when petitioner has statutory remedy under School Tribunal order.
What is the appropriate disposal of writ petition when statutory remedy is available.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Respondent Nos.2 and 4
Respondent No.3
A.S. Oka
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court