Petitioner sought admission of writ petition alleging non-compliance by BIFR with a prior Division Bench order regarding jurisdiction. Single judge disposed of petition granting liberty to approach Appellate Authority.
Petition disposed of with liberty to approach Appellate Forum; interim order continued for four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPL395_2013
Vidya amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 395 OF 2013
Ramona Rodella … Petitioner
vs.
Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. N.M. Seervai, senior counsel a/w. Mr. A. Dasgupta i/b. Jhangiani Narula and Associates, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Maneesha Dhir a/w. M/s. Dhir Dhir Associates, Advocate for the caveators.
CORAM : S.J. Vazifdar and Mrs. Mridula Bhatkar, JJ. DATE : 26th February, 2013.
P.C.
By consent, the petition is taken up for admission.
order of the Division Bench dated 6th August, 2012 in Writ Petition (L) No. 1966 of 2012 in as much as the preliminary issue as to jurisdiction has not been decided.
1 of 2
WPL395_2013
(MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.)
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition should be disposed of allowing the petitioner to approach the Appellate Forum.
Ramona Rodella
Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction
S.J. Vazifdar
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
