The High Court dismissed a Writ Petition filed to challenge an interim injunction order in a civil suit regarding property title and possession. Found the matter on merits to be for the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
W.P.No.615/13
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.615 OF 2013
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's
orders or directions
andRegistrar's
orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr.B.N.Patil, advocate for the petitioners.
Mr.V.D.Salunke, advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.
Date : 13.02.2013.
PER COURT :
2
W.P.No.615/13
according to the plaintiffs, the present suit property is the same that of earlier suit filed by the father as is clear from para 3 of the plaint. The defendants are in possession of the suit property and plaintiffs are trying to dispossess the defendants/petitioners pursuant to the injunction.
3
W.P.No.615/13
made herein.
(S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.)
Dt.13.02.2013. asp/office/wp615.13
Petitioners
Respondent Nos.1 and 2
S.V.GANGAPURWALA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court