A writ petition filed by a Society was disposed of by a single-line order because the petitioner's counsel reported no further instructions due to the death of the Society's secretary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.6136/2011
Janta Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Chandrapur, through its Secretary ...Versus...
Kum. Minu Mumtaj d/o Amanullah Khan Pathan and others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri V.D. Darne, Counsel h/f Shri M.P. Karia, Counsel for petitioner Shri A.S. Chandurkar, Counsel for R - 1
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : 06.02.2013
Shri V.D. Darne, the learned Counsel holding for Shri M.P. Kariya, the learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the petition was filed by the petitioner – Society through its Secretary. It is submitted that the Secretary has expired during the pendency of the petition and in spite of best efforts by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the name of the Secretary of the Society is not known. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the Counsel has no instructions in the matter.
In view of the statement made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.
JUDGE
ssw
Janta Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Chandrapur
Kum. Minu Mumtaj d/o Amanullah Khan Pathan
Vasanti A. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
