A writ petition was dismissed after the court directed Respondent No.4 to process and finalize the petitioner's pensionary benefits proposal within six weeks by verifying compliance with clearance certificates.
Respondent No.4 to process the proposal for grant of pensionary benefits within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
WP No.5886/2013
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.5886 OF 2013
Sardar Baldeosingh Sardar Darbarsingh Pund PETITIONER
VERSUS
The Collector, Nanded & others
RESPONDENTS
Mr. Mahesh V.Ghatge, Advocate for the petitioner Mrs. S.G.Chincholkar, AGP for respondent State Mr. Amol Gandhi, Advocate for respondent No.3
[CORAM : R. M. BORDE AND SUNIL P.DESHMUKH, J.J.]
DATE : 24th OCTOBER 2013
PER COURT:
No.3 School states that necessary compliance with regard to ‘no
dues’ or ‘no inquiry’ certificates has already been made and the
proposal for release of pensionary benefits to the petitioner is
complete and ready in all respects. The proposal is submitted to
{2}
WP No.5886/2013
respondent No.4 and is pending with respondent No.4.
to process further the proposal for grant of pensionary benefits to the petitioner and necessary action be taken within a period of six weeks from today.
[SUNIL P.DESHMUKH, J.] [R.M.BORDE, J.]
drp/A13/wp5886-13
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondent No.4 should process the proposal for grant of pensionary benefits.
Sardar Baldeosingh Sardar Darbarsingh Pund
The Collector, Nanded
R. M. BORDE
SUNIL P.DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
