This order disposed of a writ petition wherein petitioners, appointed after 31st October 2005, sought interference. The court noted prior judgment reasons precluding interference and rejected the petition, dismissing the pending civil application as well.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp.528.12.doc
1
SQP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.528 OF 2012
Nitin Janu Bhoir & Ors.
...Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
...Respondents
Mr. S. S. Pakale i/b Mr. Avinash R. Belge for Petitioners
Mr. A. B. Vagyani, Addl. G.P. with Mr. A. I. Patel, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 to 4
Mr. G. S. Hiranandani i/b Mr. C. G. Gavnekar for Respondent No.8
CORAM:- A. S. OKA AND
REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ. DATED:- OCTOBER 28, 2013
P.C.
have been admittedly appointed after 31st October, 2005. Hence, for the
reasons recorded in Judgment and Order dated 11th October, 2013 in Writ Petition No.2455/2012 and in particular paragraph 11 thereof, no case for interference is made out. The petition is rejected.
disposed of.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.) (A. S. OKA, J.)
1/1
SQ Pathan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition allowed for interference given the petitioners' appointment date after 31st October 2005.
Nitin Janu Bhoir & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
A. S. Oka
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
