Petitioner approached the High Court for relief. The Court held that an alternate remedy was available, rendering the petition unentertainable. The writ petition was disposed of without merits, granting liberty to pursue the alternate remedy.
The writ petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP No.5220/2013
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.5220 OF 2013
Smt.Yogita Samir Markad
PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS
Mr. V.B.Patil, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. S.K.Kadam, AGP for respondent State
[CORAM : R. M. BORDE AND
SUNIL P.DESHMUKH, J.J.]
DATE : 3rd SEPTEMBER 2013
PER COURT:
grievance of the petitioner, the instant petition need not be entertained.
remedy provided under the law.
petitioner to avail the alternate remedy.
[SUNIL P.DESHMUKH, J.] [R.M.BORDE, J.]
drp/A13/wp5220-13
Smt.Yogita Samir Markad
The State of Maharashtra
R. M. BORDE
SUNIL P.DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
