A writ petition was dismissed because the petitioner's counsel was absent, resulting in a default. The specific subject matter of the dispute is not detailed in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 5061 OF 1999
Forbes Forbes Campbell & Co. Ltd. & Ors. V/s Subhash Dattatraya Kamlakar
Office Notes,Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram,appearances, ................................ Court's orders or CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA J. directions and DATE : 26/04/2013 Registrar's orders
Mr. V.N.Damle, Advocates for Resp. Nos. 2 to 6.
PER COURT :
Today none represents the petitioner - Society. In light of that, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default.
[ S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
KNP/W.P. 5061.1999
Forbes Forbes Campbell & Co. Ltd. & Ors.
Subhash Dattatraya Kamlakar
S.V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
