Disposed
Saeed Ahamed Chaudhary v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/4604/2013
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( WP 4604 of 2013)
VAT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE URISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4604 OF 2013
Saeed Ahamed Chaudhary ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Ghanshyam Upadhyay i/b. Law Juris for Petitioner Mr.V.S. Gokhale -AGP for Respondent No.1 Mr.Kuldeep S. Patil for Respondent No.2
*** CORAM : V. M. KANADE, AND K.R. SHRIRAM, JJ. DATE : JULY 10, 2013
P.C.
The learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks
leave to withdraw this petition.
Writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.
[K.R.SHRIRAM, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vaishali Tikam
1/1
Saeed Ahamed Chaudhary
The State of Maharashtra
V. M. Kanade
K. R. Shriram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court