Single judge dismissed the writ petition, holding that concurrent findings of courts below and material evidence preclude exercise of writ jurisdiction to grant an injunction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 434 OF 2013
SMT. CONCEICAO PEREIRA ... Petitioner Versus SHRI. LAERENCE PEREIRA AND 2 ORS. ... Respondents
Mr. Nilesh V. S. Shirodkar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Coram:R. M. SAVANT, J. Date:1st October, 2013
P.C:
There is a concurrent finding recorded against the petitioner by the Courts below on the basis of the material on record which includes the documentary evidence on the basis of which the Courts below have refused to exercise jurisdiction in favour of the plaintiff.
R. M. SAVANT, J.
ap/-
SM. CONCEICAO PEREIRA
SHRI. LAERENCE PEREIRA AND 2 ORS.
R. M. SAVANT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
