In an writ petition seeking disposal of a Main Application pending since 1991, the court directed the Mamlatdar to decide by 31/05/2014. Petitioners sought withdrawal upon satisfaction, leading to dismissal.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 41 OF 2012
SHRI ANAND SUBRAYA SAMANT (EXPIRED) AND 4 ORS., ... Petitioners Versus SHRI UTTAM TUKARAM SALGAONKAR ALIAS PETKAR AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents
Shri S.R. Rivonkar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Shri V.P. Thali, Advocate for Respondent no.1.
Coram:R. M. SAVANT, J.
Date:13th September, 2013
P.C.:
After arguing for sometime, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners states that the petitioners would be satisfied if the main matter i.e. Misc. Application No.1/91 in Case No.JM-I/TNC/Advalpal/1/1991 be directed to be disposed of within a particular time frame.
R. M. SAVANT, J.
NH
Shri Anand Subraya Samant and 4 Ors.
Shri Uttam Tukaram Salgaonkar alias Petkar and 2 Ors.
R. M. Savant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
