The Court quashed the FIR and complaint under Section 498A IPC against petitioner Nos. 3 and 4 due to lack of specific allegations. The proceeding against petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 was allowed to continue.
Complaint quashed against petitioner Nos. 3 and 4; complaint continued against petitioner Nos. 1 and 2.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP.3574/2011(10)
1
mnm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3574 OF 2011
Kadar Yusuf Sorathiya & Ors. ...Petitioners Vs.
Dr. Kausar Sorathiya & Ors.
...Respondents
None for the Petitioners
Mr. A. Majeed Memon a/w. Mr. Subhash Kanse for Respondent No.1 Mrs. A.A. Mane, APP for the Respondent No.2 State
CORAM : MRS. ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED : 24TH JANUARY, 2013
P.C. :
Rule. Made returnable forthwith.
WP.3574/2011(10)
2
them in an anticipatory bail application taken out by some of the petitioners.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal complaint under Section 498A IPC filed against petitioners 1 and 2 should be quashed in view of matrimonial disputes.
Whether the complaint filed against petitioner Nos. 3 and 4 warrants continuation given absence of specific allegations.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kadar Yusuf Sorathiya
Dr. Kausar Sorathiya
Roshan Dalvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
