The Single Judge dismissed two writ petitions for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to deposit the required interim amount and serve the respondents within the stipulated time, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP3565 & 3566-13.doc
Sequeira
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3565 OF 2013 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3566 OF 2013
Ms.Suman Singla .. Petitioner Vs. Mahavir Centre Premises Co-operative Society Ltd. & ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Prashant D. Patil, for petitioner. Mrs.Falguni Thakkar, for respondent No.1
CORAM: N.M.JAMDAR, J. Tuesday 11 June 2013
P.C.:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent No.1. On 30 April 2013 following order came to be passed-
2
WP3565 & 3566-13.doc
petitioner is contacted him. It appears that petitioner is not interested in prosecuting these petitions. The petitions are dismissed for nonprosecution.
N.M. JAMDAR, J.
Ms. Suman Singla
Mahavir Centre Premises Co-operative Society Ltd.
N.M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
