The petitioner withdrew the writ petition with the court allowing the withdrawal and passing no order as to costs.
Writ petition allowed to be withdrawn. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3551 OF 2012
Netaji Shivaji Shitole
PETITIONER
VERSUS
Vilas Kalyan Shitole
and others RESPONDENTS
Mr.S.D.Tare h/f. Mr.S.S.Choudhary, Advocate for petitioner. Mr.S.S.Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
(CORAM : RAVINDRA V.GHUGE, J.)
DATE : 06/12/2013
PER COURT :
instructions that the petitioner desires to withdraw this petition.
Learned Adv.Mr.S.S.Kulkarni seeks costs.
( RAVINDRA V.GHUGE, J.)
khs/Dec.2013/wp3551-12
Netaji Shivaji Shitole
Vilas Kalyan Shitole
RAVINDRA V GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
