Dismissed
Sarath Gopinathan Manari v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/353/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1.wp.353.12.doc
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 353 OF 2012
Sarath Gopinathan Manari. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and another. ....Respondents
None for the Petitioner. Mr. A. S. Gadgari, APP for the Respondents-State.
CORAM: S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & G. S. PATEL, J.J.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 13, 2013.
P.C.:
The Petitioner and his Advocate, both are absent. There names are correctly displayed. In these circumstances, Writ Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(G. S. PATEL, J.) (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
1 of 1
Sarath Gopinathan Manari
The State of Maharashtra
S. C. Dharmaidhikari
G. S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court