Petitioner challenged a Family Court order regarding an application under Section 18 of HAMA. The court dismissed the petition, stating the application is not maintainable as the divorce decree with permanent alimony has already been granted and will be considered on merits during trial.
Petition dismissed; no further action needed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP No.3422_2013
jsn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3422 OF 2013
Shri Ramesh Shantaram Bhanuse --
Petitioner
V/s.
Smt. Suman Ramesh Bhanuse
Respondent
Mr. N.P. Deshpande, Adv. for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent.
CORAM : MRS. ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATE : 12th April, 2013.
P.C. :
( ROSHAN DALVI, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the Family Court's application under Section 18 of HAMA is maintainable given the prior divorce decree.
Shri Ramesh Shantaram Bhanuse
Smt. Suman Ramesh Bhanuse
Roshan Dalvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
