This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 332 OF 2013
RAM GAHININATH BODKHE AND OTHERS VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Jadhav Sunil B. APP for Respondent No.1 : Mr. G.R. Ingole Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr D.B. Kale h/f Mr. S.J. Salunke
CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. Dated: November 21, 2013
P.C. :-
Heard Mr. S.B. Jadhav, the learned counsel for the petitioners. Heard Mr. G.R. Ingole, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent/State. Heard Mr. D.B. Kale holding the brief of Mr. S.J. Salunke, the learned counsel for the respondent no.2.
sga
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
such.
( ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. )
sga
Ram Gahinath Bodkhe And Others
The State of Maharashtra
Abhay M. Thipsay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
