The petitioner was allowed to withdraw the petition and dispose of the matter as it had become infructuous following the Vice Chancellor’s order.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPL-2947-13
SKC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2947 OF 2013
Nieyaati Vinay Masurkar ..Petitioner vs. Controller of Examination & Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. S. G. Thakur for Petitioner. Mr. Rui Rodriques for Respondents.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, AND M. S. SONAK, JJ.
DATE : DECEMBER 16, 2013
P. C .
Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that pursuant to
the order passed by the Vice Chancellor under Clause 42, the Petitioner has given examination and the petition has become infructuous. The petition is allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of.
[M. S. SONAK, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Chandka
1/1
Nieyaati Vinay Masurkar
Controller of Examination & Ors.
V. M. Kanade
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
