In a writ petition, the High Court held that since applications for correction in the award are pending before the lower court and the parties have also filed an appeal, no interference is required under sections 151 and 152 of the CPC.
Writ petition dismissed. No order as to costs. Direction to agitate grounds in pending appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.265 OF 2013
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's
orders or directions
andRegistrar's
orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr.V.G.Sakolkar, advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for the State.
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.
Date : 14.01.2013.
PER COURT :
2
application U/s 151 and 152 of the C.P.C. in the pending appeal.
(S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.)
Dt.14.01.2013. asp/office/wp265.13
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the rejection of the application for correction in the award.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
State
S.V.GANGAPURWALA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court