Criminal Writ Petition transferred to the appropriate Division Bench of the High Court at Aurangabad. No substantive decision rendered; matter listed for further hearing.
Removal from the single judge's list and transmission to the appropriate Division Bench for disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
crwp240.13
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
_____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.240 OF 2013 WITH WP/241/2013
DATTU JAGANNATH BHONDWE VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Hon Ashwin V.
APP for Respondent-State: Mr.S.R. Palnitkar.
Advocate for Respondent 3 : Mr. P.V.Mandlik, Sr. Counsel with Mr. Gandhi Amol S.
CORAM : A.M. THIPSAY, J. Dated: October 21, 2013
P.C.:
Heard.
2 The matter is required to be placed before an appropriate Division Bench.
(ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.)
PLK/*
Dattu Jagannath Bhondwe
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. Thipsay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
