The High Court disposed of the Writ Petition considering the availability of an alternate remedy under Section 247 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The interim protection granted earlier continues for eight weeks to enable the filing of an appeal.
The interim order dated 12th March, 2012 is extended for a further period of eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P. No. 2318/2012
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.2318 OF 2012
Ghanashyam Digambar Lamboli ..PETITIONER VERSUS
The State of Mah. & ors.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr V.C. Patil, Advocate holding for Mr S.M. Godsay for petitioner; Mrs M.A. Deshpande, A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 to 4
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. DATE : 19th December, 2013
PER COURT:
alternate remedy under section 247 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.
(2)
W.P. No. 2318/2012
would expeditiously prefer his appeal for challenging the impugned order.
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE), JUDGE
amj/wp2318.12
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition should be disposed off in view of the availability of alternate remedy under Section 247 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.
Ghanashyam Digambar Lamboli
The State of Mah.
Ravindra V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
