The Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench dismissed a writ petition as it involved disputed questions of fact, which fall outside the scope of extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Writ petition dismissed; petitioner at liberty to take appropriate steps in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
2410wp2130.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.2130 OF 2012
(M/s. S.N. IMP vs. The Additional Directorate General, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence and another)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND Z.A. HAQ, JJ. DATED : OCTOBER 24, 2013
Heard Shri Gautam, learned Counsel for petitioner, Shri Mirza, learned Counsel for respondent no.1 and Shri Thakkar, learned Counsel for respondent no.2.
The writ petition involves disputed questions of facts, which cannot be gone into in the extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to take appropriate steps as available in law, if so advised.
JUDGE JUDGE
khj
1 issue framed by the court
whether disputed questions of facts can be examined in extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. S.N. IMP
The Additional Directorate General, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
another
B.R. GAVAI
Z.A. HAQ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
