Petitioner submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous due to subsequent developments. The court disposed of the petition as infructuous.
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp2104.12
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2104 OF 2012
[ Mandabai Shivaji Khillari vs. The State of Mah. & Ors. ]
Office Notes, OfficeMemoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’sorders or directionsand Registrar’sorders |
C |
ourt’s or Judge’s orders |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mr. Sanjaypetitioner. |
D. Kotk |
ar, |
Advocate for |
|
CORDAT |
AME |
: S.S. SHINDE, J.: 10thAPRIL, 2013 |
||
PER COURT |
: |
|||
. The l |
earned |
Cou |
nsel appearing for the |
|
petitioner |
submit |
s |
that, in view of the |
|
subsequent |
develo |
pme |
nts, the writ petition |
|
has become |
infruc |
tuo |
us. The writ petition |
|
is disposed |
of as |
inf |
ructuous. |
|
[S.S. SHINDE, J.] |
sut/Apr13
Mandabai Shivaji Khillari
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. SHINDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court