Petitioner requested to withdraw a criminal writ petition after trial commencement. High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn and was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 (21)WP-1785-12
Tilak
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1785 of 2012
Sanjay Chandrasen Rane ... Petitioner versus Siddharth M. Shah (HUF) & ors ... Respondents
Ms.Priyanka Wable, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Ganesh Gole, Advocate for the respondent no.1. Mrs.G.P. Mulekar, APP for the State.
CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.
DATED : JUNE 10, 2013
P.C.
1 Heard.
2 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that since the trial has already started, she has instructions to withdraw the petition.
3 Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such.
( ABHAY M.THIPSAY,J )
Sanjay Chandrasen Rane
Siddharth M. Shah (HUF)
Abhay M. Thipsay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
