The writ petition was disposed of as the petitioner tendered the terms of a compromise arrived at in the related revenue proceeding. No substantive issues were addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp1647.12
-1-
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1647 OF 2012
(Bismillah Khan Murtuja Khan Pathan and Anr vs. Abdul Jabbarkhan Murtaza Khan & Ors)
________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________
Mr. Vinay B. Anjanwatikar, advocate for petitioners
CORAM : S. S. SHINDE, J. DATED : 25th APRIL, 2013 .....
P.C. :-
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has tendered across the bar a copy of compromise terms, arrived at between the parties in R.C.S. No. 133 of 2011. Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition may be disposed of. In the light of the above circumstances, writ petition stands disposed of.
rlj/
Bismillah Khan Murtuja Khan Pathan and Anr
Abdul Jabbarkhan Murtaza Khan & Ors
S. S. SHINDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
