The petitioner abandoned the criminal writ petition for discharge as an efficacious remedy was available before the magistrate. The petition was withdrawn and dismissed with liberty to apply for discharge before the magistrate.
Petition withdrawn and dismissed with liberty to apply for discharge before the magistrate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CWP-1513.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1513 OF 2012
FIROZ NAZMUL HASAN KHAN
.. PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS... RESPONDENTS
Mr. Chetan S. Domre i/b Makarand Panchakshari, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. R. M.Gadhvi, APP for the State
CORAM:-ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : 18/07/2013
P.C.
Heard.
lerned magistrate is available to the petitioner, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he would not press the present petition.
as such, with liberty to the applicant to apply for discharge by
making an appropriate application before the learned magistrate.
1/2
2
CWP-1513.12
magistrate shall decide the same expeditiously and, in any case within a period of three months from the date on which it is made.
(ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.)
md.saleem
2/2
Firoz Nazmul Hasan Khan
State of Maharashtra
Abhay M. Thipsay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
