In a criminal writ petition, the petitioner allowed to withdraw as the complainant affirmed withdrawal of the underlying complaint and the representative of respondent no.2 confirmed it.
Permission granted to withdraw the criminal writ petition; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
26-WP-1478-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1478 OF 2012
C.P.RAGINI
)...PETITIONER
V/s.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.
)...RESPONDENTS
Ms.Yogini D. Ghawale Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mrs.R.V.Newton APP for the State.
Mr.Vinayak A. Kamble, Assistant Manager, Legal, Representative of Respondent No.2 – M/s.Kotak Securities Ltd.
CORAM: ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.
DATE : 11th JUNE, 2013.
P.C. :
1 Heard Ms.Yogini D. Ghawale, the learned counsel for the petitioner.
2 One Vinayak A. Kamble, representative of respondent no.2 – original complainant – is present, pursuant to the notice issued by this court. He states that the original complainant has already withdrawn the complaint in question.
3 The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner was not informed of such withdrawal.
avk 1/2
26-WP-1478-2012
4 However, since a categorical statement is made by the representative of the respondent no.2 that the complaint has been withdrawn, which is accepted, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition.
5 The petition is allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such.
(ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.)
avk 2/2
C.P. RAGINI
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
ABHAY M. THIPSAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
