The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of writ petition No. 1394 of 2013 after counsel for the respondent noted that a sonography machine had been de-sealed per a criminal court order and the petitioner's license renewed, rendering adjudication unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 1394.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1394 OF 2013
Dr. Vandana Prashant Choudhari .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents
Shri K. C. Sant, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Shri S. K. Kadam, A.G.P. for the Respondent No. 1.
Shri V. D. Gunale, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 08TH APRIL, 2013.
PER COURT :
. Shri Gunale, the learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 submits that the sonography machine has been de-sealed as per the order passed by the Criminal Court, so also the license of the petitioner is renewed.
[ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/April 13
Dr. Vandana Prashant Choudhari
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
