Prakashchand Rathi v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged Sessions Court orders under Section 138 NI Act via Writ Petition. Respondent raised objection regarding non-exhaustion of revisional remedy. Court accepted objection, allowed withdrawal, and directed filing of revision before Sessions Court within six weeks without limitation bar.
What did the court decide?
Petitions allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file revision before Sessions Court within six weeks without limitation bar.
What the court decided
1
CWP-1281-82.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1281 OF 2012 WITH
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1274 OF 2012 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1275 OF 2012 WITH
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1276 OF 2012 WITH
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1277 OF 2012 WITH
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1278 OF 2012 WITH
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1279 OF 2012 WITH
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1280 OF 2012 WITH
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1282 OF 2012
PRAKASHCHAND RATHI
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an accused can approach the High Court directly without filing a revision before the Sessions Court.
How to handle the preliminary objection regarding non-exhaustion of statutory remedies in this context.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Prakashcand Rathi
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
Coram
Abhay M. Thipsay
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court