The writ petitions stood dismissed as abated because the court service notice could not be served on the petitioners, who were reported to be dead. The court held that no steps were taken to bring their legal representatives on record.
Writ petitions dismissed as abated. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1250 OF 1992 WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 1730 OF 1992
Vinod Rajaram Zope Thr. its constitute Attorney V/s Dhanraj Pandurang Mahajan.& Ors.
| Office Notes,Office | Court's or Judge's orders |
|---|---|
| Memoranda of |
|
| Coram,appearances, | ................................ |
| Court's orders or |
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J. |
| directions and |
|
| Registrar's orders | DATE : 08/01/2013. |
PER COURT :
[ S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
KNP/W.P. 1250....1992
Vinod Rajaram Zope Thr. its constitute Attorney
Dhanraj Pandurang Mahajan
S.V.Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
