A writ petition challenging pension/retirement grievances was disposed of after the Government of India submitted a communication redressing the petitioners' grievance, entitling them to consequential benefits.
Petitioners entitled to consequential benefits; grievance redressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
28.wp.1191.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1191 OF 2013
Dr.Ameya Mangesh Tirodkar & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors.
... Petitioners
... Respondents
Ms.P.U. Thorat, Advocate for Petitioners.
Mr.B.M.Chaterjee a/w. Mr.M.S.Bhardwaj for Respondent Nos.1 and 3.
Mr.L.S.Shetty a/w. Ms.Manjiri Joshi i/b Mr.L.S.Shetty for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR & K. R. SHRIRAM, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 4, 2013.
P.C.
1 Mr.Chaterjee, learned counsel appearing on behalf of
Respondent Nos.1 and 3 tenders a communication dated 2nd July 2013 from the Government of India from the Deputy Establishment
Officer, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre addressed to their
Advocate. The same is taken on record and marked ‘X’.
Shraddha Talekar P.A.
28.wp.1191.13
Liberty to apply in case of difficulty.
Shraddha Talekar P.A.
Dr. Ameya Mangesh Tirodkar & Ors.
Union of India & Ors.
S.J. VAZIFDAR
K. R. SHRIRAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
