In a writ petition regarding premises possession and demolition, the court granted leave to the petitioners to withdraw the petition as it had become infructuous and disposed of the matter as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10-wpl-1296-13
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION LODGING NO.1296 OF 2013
Samir Premji Dedhia and Anr. Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors.
....Petitioners.
...Respondents.
Mr. Mustafa Kachwala, advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. J.S.Saluja, AGP for respondent no.1.
Mr. Cyrus Ardeshir i/by Kanga & Co. advocate for R. No.3.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J.
DATED : June 10, 2013.
P.C.:
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners states that since possession of the premises in question is already taken and the same has also been demolished by respondent no.3/developer, petition is rendered infructuous.
2 In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Leave granted. Petition
stands disposed of as withdrawn.
(RANJIT MORE, J.)
Shivgan
Samir Premji Dedhia and Anr.
State of Maharashtra
RANJIT MORE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
