In this writ petition, the petitioner challenged the Trial Court's order rejecting an application to amend the written statement to add parties for a deleted suit property; the High Court dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 1144.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1144 OF 2013
Gurusidhappa Shankarappa Malkatte .. Petitioner
Versus
Jagdevi Panditrao Wakade and others .. Respondents
Shri N. D. Sonvane, Advocate for the Petitioner.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 11TH FEBRUARY, 2013.
PER COURT :
. The application for amendment filed by the petitioner is rejected.
2 wp 1144.13
said transaction is not binding on the petitioner.
3 wp 1144.13
[ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/Feb. 13
Gurusidhappa Shankarappa Malkatte
Jagdevi Panditrao Wakade
S. V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
