The High Court dismissed multiple writ petitions filed by the petitioner for want of prosecution as the petitioner remained absent despite receiving notices from the Registry.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8.wp.1097.12.doc
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1097 OF 2012 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2020 OF 2012 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3106 OF 2012 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3267 OF 2012 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3350 OF 2012 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3385 FO 2012 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3735 OF 2012
Shri. Shinde Sarjerao Mahadev. ....Petitioner Versus City Civil Court (Senior Level), Islampur and others. ....Respondents
None for the Petitioner in all Petitions. Mrs. P. H. Kantharia, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM: S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & G. S. PATEL, J.J.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 6, 2013.
P.C.:
The Petitioner is absent. Since he has been remaining
absent, notice has been issued by the Registry to him to remain present and argue the case. But despite receipt of such notice and the Bailiff's report evidencing the same, the Petitioner is absent
1 of 2
8.wp.1097.12.doc
Shephali
today. In these circumstances, all these Writ Petitions are dismissed for want of prosecution.
2 of 2
Shri. Shinde Sarjerao Mahadev
City Civil Court and others
S. C. DHARMADHIKARI
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
