The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of Writ Petition No. 1069 of 2010 as infructuous on the basis of instructions from counsel for the petitioner. The order was recorded without substantive discussion.
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-:(1):-
WP1069-10
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
OfficeNotes,Office Court's or Judge's orders.
MemorandaofCoram,
appearance,Court's
orders or directions and
Registrar's orders.
WRIT PETITION NO. 1069 OF 2010
MADHAVRAO KAMAJIRAO KADAM AND ANR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ANR
...
Advocate for Petitioners : Ms. M.S.
Shendage, Advocate h/f Mr. Katneshwarkar
P.R.
AGP for Respondent/ State: Mrs. V. A.
Shinde.
***
CORAM:S. B. DESHMUKH &
M. T. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED: 13th MARCH, 2013
PER COURT:
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on
instructions, states that the petition has
become infructuous.
2.In this view of the matter, writ
petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
No costs.
[M. T. JOSHI, J.] [S.B.DESHMUKH, J.]
Dt.13/03/2013
ans/WP1069-10
Madhavrao Kamajorao Kadam and Ors.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
S.B.Deshmukh
M.T.Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court