A criminal writ petition turned infructuous post-filing; the High Court of Bombay dismissed the petition without providing substantive reasons.
The petition has been turned infructuous and is hereby dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
krs
1
cwp1008.13
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1008 OF 2013
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr.R.D.Suryawanshi for the petitioners. Mr.S.S.Pednekar, Addl. Public Prosecutor for State.
CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : AUGUST 08, 2013. P.C.:
Heard.
The learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, states that the petition has, over the period, turned infructuous. Dismissed.
(K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)
Petitioners
State
K.U. CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
