This court disposed of a succession suit by enforcing consent terms, directing the registry to issue probate expeditiously to the plaintiff and accepting the parties' undertakings.
Probate of will to be issued expeditiously in favour of the plaintiff.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.. 1 ..
22-TS-38.12.sxw
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY . TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 38 OF 2012 IN PETITION NO. 1444 OF 2011
Priya Hitesh Sampat
… Plaintiff
Versus
Ramesh Ranjitsingh Sampat and anr. … Defendants
Mr. D.R. Mishra for the plaintiff.
Mr. Imtiaz Raibakkar for the defendants.
CORAM : R.D.DHANUKA J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 23, 2013. P.C.
The leaned counsel for the parties have tendered consent terms which are signed by the parties as well as their respective advocates. The consent terms are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. Parties are present in court. The suit is disposed of in terms of consent terms. Undertakings recorded in the consent terms are accepted.
In view of the consent terms, office is directed to proceed with the issuance of probate in favour of the plaintiff expeditiously.
(R.D.DHANUKA, J.)
R.D. Dhenuka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
