In a second appeal, the court held that consent terms for separation were fully complied with upon verification of funds transfer and property title transfer, leading to a decreeing of the consent terms.
Passing of decree in terms of the consent terms. Civil Application No. 972 of 2011 is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
395-11-SA=.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO. 395 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 972 OF 2011 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 395 OF 2011
Sau. Mayuri Mahesh Jadhav
.. Appellant
v/s.
Mahesh Sitaram Jadhav ..Respondent
Ms. Arati P. Bhide for the appellant Mr. Ravindra A. Lokhande for the respondent
CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 30th JANUARY, 2013.
P.C.
Learned advocate for the appellant upon instructions makes a
statement that her client has received FDR for the sum of Rs.2.5
lakhs as set out in Clause 6(b) of the consent terms standing in
the name of Kumar Shubham, as also FDR for Rs.2.5 lakhs in
1 of 2
U.S.Jagtap
395-11-SA=.doc
the name of Kumari Sayali as set out in Clause 6(c).
[R.Y.GANOO, J.]
2 of 2
U.S.Jagtap
Sau. Mayuri Mahesh Jadhav
Mahesh Sitaram Jadhav
R.Y. Ganoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
