Disposed
The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-Ii, Pune v. Indraprastha Premises Pvt. Ltd.
Bombay HCRPW/94/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
6-rpw.94.2013.doc
nsc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION NO.94 OF 2013 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1889 OF 1995
The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Pune
v/s. Indraprastha Premises Pvt. Limited.
...Petitioner
...Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta, Senior Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Vineet Naik, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr.Sukund Kulkarni and Mr.Dipak Deshmukh i/b. Mr.Balaji Gadi, for the respondent.
CORAM: A. S. OKA & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
OCTOBER 22, 2013.
P.C.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE,J.) (A.S. OKA,J.)
The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Pune
Indraprastha Premises Pvt. Limited.
A. S. Oka
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court