In RC 16/2012, the Court dismissed the review petition in Second Appeal No.778 of 2011 where the original appellant sought review of an August 30, 2012 order confirming the first appellate Court's order. Noting concurrent findings and absence of grounds, the Court rejected the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RP16.12
1
KJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION NO.16 OF 2012
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO.778 OF 2011
Shri Narayan Bhau Wagh & Ors. V/s.
)....Petitioners
Shri Laxman Shankar Wagh @ Mali & Ors. )....Respondents ----
Mr.Ravindra S.Pachundkar i/by Mr.Dilip Bodake for the petitioners. Mr.P.J.Thorat for the respondent nos.1 to 4.
CORAM : MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J (IN CHAMBER)
DATE : 9th April, 2013.
PC :-
1 I have heard the petitioners at the time of granting interim stay and suggestion was made to the parties to settle the matter amicably. The learned Advocate Mr.Thorat for the respondents who is present today informs that it is not possible to settle the matter and accordingly it is informed to the applicants.
2 I have perused the record and the petition. The original appellant has filed this application to review the order dated 30th
2 RP16.12
August 2012 thereby confirming the order passed by the 1st appellate Court. There is concurrent findings against this applicant. No ground is made in this review petition. Hence, petition is rejected.
(JUDGE)
Shri Narayan Bhau Wagh & Ors.
Shri Laxman Shankar Wagh @ Mali & Ors.
Mrudula Bhaktar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
