In a review petition under Civil Revision Application No.1136 of 2013, the High Court of Bombay at the Appellate Side dismissed the review application merely for non-appearance of the petitioner and his advocate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 rp7.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
REVIEW PETITION NO.7 OF 2013 IN
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.1136 OF 2013
Sayed Hasan Nabi ... Petitioner. . V/s. Anilkumar Tarachand Jain ... Respondent.
None for the petitioner. Mr. G. P. Prabhu for the respondent.
CORAM : SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J. 29th November, 2013.
P.C.
advocate are absent. The review petition is dismissed.
H. C. Shiv, P.S.
Sayed Hasan Nabi
Anilkumar Tarachand Jain
R.P. Sondurbaldota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
