Criminal revision filed against interim maintenance order dismissed by Single Judge, Alibaug, for failure to justify higher claim.
Revision application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) (3) Revn 92/11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Amk
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 92 OF 2011
Vrunda Namdev Dare Vs. Namdev Savalaram Dare & Anr.
.. Petitioner
.. Respondents
None for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents.
CORAM : MRS. ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATE : 7 th MARCH, 2013.
P.C.
This application has been filed since 18.02.2011. It has remained in Court for one year. It has been adjourned from time to time. Petitioner has challenged the amount of interim maintenance granted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad at Alibaug partly allowing the appeal from order of Magistrate granting maintenance. It is not shown by the petitioner-wife, who has challenged the order, how higher amount can be claimed as an interim maintenance. Hence the Revision Application is dismissed.
(ROSHAN DALVI, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision application challenging the amount of interim maintenance granted should be allowed.
Vrunda Namdev Dare
Namdev Savalaram Dare
Roshan Dalvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
