Chandrakant Baburao Adsule v. the State of Mah and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Review application dismissed as devoid of substance with no grounds for review of the impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURNAGABAD
Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS appearances, Court’s orders or directios and Registrar’s Orders.
75 REVIEW APPLICATION ST NO 2049/2013
CHANDRAKANT BABURAO ADSULE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. T. M. Venjane AGP for Respondents: Mrs. A. V. Gondhalekar ...
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Dated: February 01, 2013 ... PER COURT :
( U. D. SALVI, J. ) ( R.M. BORDE, J. ) ...
dyb
CHANDRAKANT BABURAO ADSULE
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
R.M. BORDE
U. D. SALVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court