The High Court at Bombay decreed a suit for divorce by mutual consent between Farzeen Hanosh Udwadia and Hanosh Sam Udwadia based on affidavits and consent terms signed by both parties and their advocates following their decision to separate.
Decree of divorce by mutual consent as per consent terms signed by both parties
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ps-6.12.doc
ppn 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PARSI SUIT NO.6 OF 2012
Farzeen Hanosh Udwadia .. Plaintiff Vs. Hanosh Sam Udwadia .. Defendant
Ms. Taubon F. Irani for the plaintiff. Ms. Farzeen Hanosh Udwadia, plaintiff-in-person present. Ms. Gulestan Dubash for the defendant.
Mr. Hanosh Sam Udwadia, defendant-in-person present.
CORAM : N.M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 12 AUGUST 2013
P.C. :
. The suit was initially filed seeking decree of divorce under Section 32 (dd) of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act,1936.
ppn 2 ps-6.12.doc
compound the Complaint filed by her under the provisions of the Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The defendant has stated that the defendant has withdrawn all the allegations leveled against the plaintiff.
N.M. JAMDAR, J.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the parties have reconciled and are now seeking decree of divorce by mutual consent.
Whether the consent terms signed by the parties and their advocates are valid and should be taken on record.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
N.M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
