Writ petition PIL No. 225 of 2010 filed by Nivrutti Barku Bahikar and others against State of Maharashtra and others was allowed to be withdrawn in the High Court of Bombay. The matter was disposed of accordingly.
Allowed withdrawal of writ petition and disposed of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(PIL 225 of 2010)
VAT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.225 OF 2010
Nivrutti Barku Bahikar and Ors. ...Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents
Ms.Priti Walimbe i/b. Ms.Chaitrali Deshmukh for Petitioners Mr.S.N. Patil -AGP for Respondent No.1
Mr.Prabhakar Jadhav i/b. Mr.V.P. Sawant for Respondent No.2 Mr.P.K. Dhakephalkar, Senior Counsel i/b.V.G.Ghosalkar for Respondent No.3
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, AND K.R. SHRIRAM, JJ
P.C.
[K.R.SHRIRAM, J] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vaishali Tikam
1/1
Nivrutti Barku Bahikar and Ors.
State of Maharashtra and Ors.
V. M. KANADE
K.R. SHRIRAM
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court