The High Court disposed of PIL No.12 of 2013, directing the Deputy CEO to decide on report acceptance or re-enquiry without further interference.
The PIL is disposed of with a direction for the Deputy CEO to take a final decision on the report.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Public Interest Litigation No.12 of 2013
Bhujangrao Shripati Vetal.
.. Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Others. .. Respondents.
Shri. P.B. Shirsath, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri. S.G. Nandedkar, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Shri. S.T. Shelke, Advocate, for respondent Nos.3 and 4.
CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & A.V. NIRGUDE, JJ. DATE : 25th APRIL 2013
ORDER:
Sd/- Sd/- (A.V. NIRGUDE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl
Bhujangrao Shripati Vetal.
The State of Maharashtra
NARESH H PATIL
A.V. NIRGUDE
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
